|
Repercussions of
Not Having Employer’s Liability Insurance
Because it is compulsory for
employers within the United Kingdom to carry a minimum of five
million pounds of employer’s liability insurance, the Health and
Safety Executive, enforces steep levies for violators of the law.
Currently, the penalties for lacking the required policy, accrue at
a daily rate of up to £2,500, until the company has remedied the
issue.
Additionally, laws require that your evidentiary certificate of the
policy must be able to be viewed by all employees of the company.
Typically, this is displayed in a common employee area, such as a
break room, or common entryway within the building. However, it has
become increasingly popular for businesses to display their
certificate of insurance electronically. For this method to be
acceptable, access to, or utilization of a computer would typically
need to be a daily part of labourers’ job functions. Violating this
legality, can result in fines up to £1,000 daily, until the
certificate is properly displayed in accordance with the regulation.
For
details about UK employers liability insurance please visit
this site
Obviously, the most serious
repercussion of not carrying Employer’s Liability Insurance occurs
when an employee suffers injuries and requires medical treatment. In
this situation, the employee will be suing the company directly for
compensation relating to their claim. Typically, insurance policies
will cover these amounts up to the subscribed limits when purchased.
If no such policy exists, full financial responsibility falls upon
the company, which could be the demise of the enterprise.
Consequently, if an employee sues the company for liability, any
responsible parties could additionally be ordered to pay exorbitant
fines, and possibly be sentenced to jail time. Possibilities such as
these render obtaining a policy as beneficial, regardless of the
premiums.
One of the most common misconceptions applicable to Employer’s
Liability Insurance, is whether a particular enterprise is compelled
by law to carry a policy. Family owned and operated enterprises are
one such affected group that is not required to have coverage if
only immediate relatives are employed at the business. In
retrospect, protecting the welfare of one’s family is typically of
high importance, therefore, obtaining a policy in order to do so,
may be beneficial for family owned companies. It is detrimental to
consider that any sort of familial dispute could serve as a catalyst
to cause even close relatives to find themselves seeking remediation
in the court of law.
Because of the complexities involved in understanding the law
itself, it is highly advised that owners seeking to advise
themselves in these matters undertake stringent and thorough
research of the legalities. Those left with any uncertainties, are
best advised to seek professional guidance or counsel for
assistance. Bear in mind that the only fail-safe way to ensure the
best interest of all parties are
served, is to purchase and maintain adequate employee insurance.
|